-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(js): update generated .swcrc file to align with @swc/core@1.3.85 #19214
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 6f99473. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 5 targets
Sent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
29b3098
to
9c985a3
Compare
9c985a3
to
49e3058
Compare
32ca8e5
to
e62cb20
Compare
e62cb20
to
bda90c4
Compare
a1ded31
to
462f3f7
Compare
462f3f7
to
8ce644a
Compare
8ce644a
to
5a1d675
Compare
5a1d675
to
d9b3115
Compare
58024ee
to
bce1700
Compare
bce1700
to
9a2407e
Compare
0582e31
to
187a6e2
Compare
This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request. |
This PR fixes an issue with
.swcrc
using options that are now invalid in@swc/core@1.3.85
. Whenmodule.type
ises6
, thestrict
andnoInterop
options cannot be set.The point is to transpile the library with interop between CJS and ESM, and tests show that the resulting output are the same regardless of these options (even in
@swc/core@1.3.84
). The following is the expected output, and removing the options don't affect it.See: swc-project/swc@7e8d72d
Current Behavior
Expected Behavior
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #